| Reporter |
Drew Noakes (drewnoakes)
|
|---|---|
| Created | May 23, 2008 5:23:50 PM |
| Updated | Apr 11, 2018 6:44:11 PM |
| Subsystem | Code Analysis |
| Assignee | Ivan Serduk (IvanSerduk) |
| Priority | Normal |
| State | Open |
| Type | Feature |
| Fix version | Backlog |
| Affected versions | No Affected versions |
| Fixed In Version ReSharper | Undefined |
| VsVersion | All Versions |
In the following code, the field is not required. It would suffice to make both usages local in scope. I can't think of a scenario in which applying this change would break the code's behaviour.
public sealed class TestClass
{
private string _field;
public void A()
{
_field = "A";
_field.ToString();
}
public void B()
{
_field = "B";
_field.ToString();
}
}
public sealed class TestClass
{
private string _field;
public void A()
{
_field = "A";
_field.ToString();
}
public void B()
{
_field = "B";
_field.ToString();
}
}