Quantcast
Channel: YouTrackReSharper (RSRP) - Bug and Issue Tracker
Viewing all 106942 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

RSRP-303061: 'Unknown error' window during rename refactoring

April 16, 2018, 3:23 am
$
0
0
Reporter Kirill Skrygan (kirill.skrygan) Kirill Skrygan (kirill.skrygan)
Created May 17, 2012 11:52:52 AM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 1:23:57 PM
Resolved Apr 16, 2018 1:23:57 PM
Subsystem Refactorings
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Critical
State Can't Reproduce
Type Bug
Fix version No Fix versions
Affected versions No Affected versions
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
WebSiteProjectFalvorFactoryVs.CreateProjectProperties. Tried to rename parameter platfromId and all related symbols within - got an error.
↧
Search

RSRP-304504: Bogus 'redundand String.Format highlighting'

April 16, 2018, 3:29 am
$
0
0
Reporter Sergey Kuks (coox) Sergey Kuks (coox)
Created May 23, 2012 10:15:21 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 1:29:53 PM
Resolved Apr 16, 2018 1:29:52 PM
Subsystem Code Analysis - Annotations
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Obsolete
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions No Affected versions
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
in the case String.Format is necessary because there's no overload with IFormatProvider in BinaryWriter
BTW there's no QF to remove redundand code
BinaryWriter writer;
writer.WriteLine(String.Format(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, "{0:d/M/yyyy HH:mm:ss}", entry.FileAccessTime));
↧
↧

RSRP-312199: Lambda inlining bug

April 16, 2018, 3:32 am
$
0
0
Reporter Alexander Logger (inTagger) Alexander Logger (inTagger)
Created Jun 18, 2012 12:35:21 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 1:32:46 PM
Resolved Apr 16, 2018 1:32:46 PM
Subsystem Context Actions
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Obsolete
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 7.0
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
Look at the screenshots for details.
↧

RSRP-318328: Could you please add keyboard shortcut for "Do not rename overloads" item in Rename dialog?

April 16, 2018, 3:34 am
$
0
0
Reporter Sergey (Shchegrikovich) Sergey (Shchegrikovich)
Created Jun 28, 2012 12:34:49 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 1:34:44 PM
Resolved Apr 16, 2018 1:34:44 PM
Subsystem Refactorings
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Obsolete
Type Feature
Fix version No Fix versions
Affected versions 7.0
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
You can press ALT-R and select "Rename overloads", but there is no key shortcut for "Do not rename overloads".
See attached file.
↧

RSRP-326704: Reorder add constraint/ remove constraint bulb items

April 16, 2018, 3:36 am
$
0
0
Reporter Sergey Kuks (coox) Sergey Kuks (coox)
Created Jul 16, 2012 9:09:49 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 1:36:07 PM
Resolved Apr 16, 2018 1:36:07 PM
Subsystem Quick Fixes
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Obsolete
Type Feature
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions No Affected versions
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions 
  class Foo<TFoo> where TFoo : class 
  {
    
  }

  class Bar<TBar>
  {
    private Foo<TBar> myFoo;
  }
see http://www.rsdn.ru/forum/jetbrains/4820553.1.aspx
↧
↧

RSRP-326832: Refactoring: move class to antoher file creates file with wrong encoding

April 16, 2018, 3:40 am
$
0
0
Reporter Michael Lund (icodeit) Michael Lund (icodeit)
Created Jul 17, 2012 4:37:04 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 1:40:01 PM
Subsystem Refactorings
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Submitted
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 2018.1, 6.1
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
The encoding of the created file should be the same as the encoding of the file where the class came from.

My specific problem has to do with a project where I have to use UTF-8 with signature and resharper creates file with another encoding.
↧

RSRP-392220: ReSharper not reporting "Auto-implemented property accessor is never used"

April 16, 2018, 3:40 am
$
0
0
Reporter Michael Sloane (Michael_Sloane) Michael Sloane (Michael_Sloane)
Created Nov 11, 2013 8:42:34 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 1:40:20 PM
Subsystem Code Analysis - Solution-wide
Assignee Ivan Serduk (IvanSerduk)
Priority Normal
State Submitted
Type Bug
Fix version 9.0
Affected versions No Affected versions
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
I have several cases where ReSharper (within the VisualStudio IDE) is not reporting the following issue:

<IssueType Id="UnusedAutoPropertyAccessor.Global" Category="Potential Code Quality Issues" Description="Auto-implemented property accessor is never used: Non-private accessibility" Severity="WARNING"/>

However, this issue is reported by the ReSharper command line tools.
Both ReSharper in the IDE and the ReSharper command line tools are using the same solution settings file (i.e. <solution_name>.sln.DotSettings)

ReSharper version: 8.0.2000.2660
ReSharper Command Line Tools version: 8.0.0.39
Microsoft Visual Studio Ultimate 2013- Version 12.0.21005.1 REL

My problem is that that the command line tool and IDE tool are inconsistent. If I could disable the warning so that it was not reported by the command line tool, that would be an acceptable solution. Unfortunately, I don't know what comment to insert to disable the warning, since the IDE tool does not show it.

Alternatively, if I had a version of the IDE tool that showed the warning, that would be acceptable too.

The code that is causing the warning is very simple:

public class TodoItem
{
public string ModelName { get; set; }
public string IpAddress { get; set; }
public string Status { get; set; }
}

Status is set, but not used, which is causing the warning to be reported by the Command Line tools. The same warning is not reported by the IDE tool.
↧

RSRP-327511: Good way to implement read-only property with getter

April 16, 2018, 4:32 am
$
0
0
Reporter Alexey Kuptsov (alexey.kuptsov) Alexey Kuptsov (alexey.kuptsov)
Created Jul 19, 2012 6:24:25 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 2:32:13 PM
Resolved Apr 16, 2018 2:32:13 PM
Subsystem Quick Fixes
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Obsolete
Type Feature
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions No Affected versions
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
What we have:
public interface ICanBeValid
{
  bool IsValid { get; }
}

public class MyCanBeValid : ICanBeValid{caret}
{}

Default "Alt+Enter, Enter" way makes:
public class MyCanBeValid : ICanBeValid{caret}
{
  public bool IsValid { get; private set; }
}

(There is non-noticeable option "Properties as:" if ICanBeValud contains more than one member.)

We need a simple way to implement this property with single getter:
public class MyCanBeValid : ICanBeValid{caret}
{
  public bool IsValid { get { throw new NotImplementedException(); } }
}
↧
Search

RSRP-463014: Ignore unsupported projects in R# build

April 16, 2018, 4:47 am
$
0
0
Reporter Dmitry Matveev (dmitry.matveev@jetbrains.com) Dmitry Matveev (dmitry.matveev@jetbrains.com)
Created Feb 9, 2017 1:20:23 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 2:47:29 PM
Subsystem Solution builder
Assignee Anton Spilnyy (Anton.Spilnyy)
Priority Critical
State Submitted
Type Feature
Fix version 2018.2
Affected versions 2016.3
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
https://www.jetbrains.com/help/resharper/2016.3/Building_Solution.html#comment-3145613280

Great functionality! But, can I suggest a "easy" improvement?. Please, make the "not supported projects" something to bypass, not something that disallows completely Resharper Build. For example, if I have a Web Site in my solution (I have one, in fact 8·D) allow me just to say Resharper to bypass this project, but work with the rest as if this one does not exists. Right now what I need to do, if I want to use Resharper build, is to create a partial solution without this project, that doesn't look like a good solution.
↧
↧

RSRP-328277: Create overload refactoring should preserve return type

April 16, 2018, 4:51 am
$
0
0
Reporter Guest 256 (guest256) Guest 256 (guest256)
Created Jul 25, 2012 7:06:04 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 2:51:42 PM
Subsystem Quick Fixes - Create From Usage
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Submitted
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 2018.1, 7.0
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
Original code:
    internal static class Bar
    {
        public static void SomeMethod()
        {
            var i = Foo(DateTime.Now);
                           ^
                     // set cursor here and call “Create overload for 'Foo'” action
        }

        private static int Foo(string s)
        {
            return 42;
        }
    }

Current:
    internal static class Bar
    {
        public static void SomeMethod()
        {
            var i = Foo(DateTime.Now); // compilation error, cannot assign void value!           
        }

        private static void Foo(DateTime now) // return type is void
        {
            throw new NotImplementedException();
        }

        private static int Foo(string s)
        {
            return 42;
        }
    }

Expected:
    internal static class Bar
    {
        public static void SomeMethod()
        {
            var i = Foo(DateTime.Now);
        }

        private static int Foo(DateTime now) // return type is int
        {
            throw new NotImplementedException();
        }

        private static int Foo(string s)
        {
            return 42;
        }
    }

Having overloaded methods with different return types isn't best practice, so R# should create overloads with the same return type.

Note: replacing implicitly-typed variable “i” with explicitly-typed solves the problem, but it's workaround because R# type will inferred from usage, not from overload origin.
↧

RSRP-328476: Rename fails

April 16, 2018, 4:57 am
$
0
0
Reporter Eric Gurney (ekgurney) Eric Gurney (ekgurney)
Created Jul 26, 2012 9:23:20 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 2:57:13 PM
Resolved Apr 16, 2018 2:57:13 PM
Subsystem Refactorings
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Can't Reproduce
Type Unspecified
Fix version No Fix versions
Affected versions No Affected versions
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
I am trying to rename an interface. After entering the new name and select next. I get a "Rename related symbols" dialog, all items are checked. Select next, all dialogs disappear, no errors or warnings, but the rename did not occur.
↧

RSRP-328672: Rename fails

April 16, 2018, 4:58 am
$
0
0
Reporter Johan (JohaViss) Johan (JohaViss)
Created Jul 29, 2012 11:39:24 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 2:58:41 PM
Resolved Apr 16, 2018 2:58:41 PM
Subsystem Refactorings
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Obsolete
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 7.1.3, 8.0.1, 8.1 EAP
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
Rename fails when there are one of more characters selected in the item to be renamed.
Resharper 7.0
↧

RSRP-328771: Create enum member 'Value' context action does not position cursor correctly

April 16, 2018, 5:03 am
$
0
0
Reporter Alex Berezoutsky (fergard) Alex Berezoutsky (fergard)
Created Jul 31, 2012 4:25:30 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 3:03:58 PM
Subsystem Quick Fixes
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Open
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 2018.1, 7.0
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
I write Enum qualifier and new non-existing enum memer MyEnum.NewValue) in a separate file than Enum definition;
hit "Alt+Enter";
select "Create enum member 'NewValue'" action, new enum member is created, file with Enum definition is opened and got focus, but cursor is not moved where new enum member is and stays on top of the file.
↧
↧

RSRP-464853: Manage options - search in Reset/Copy options dialogs does not work

April 16, 2018, 5:14 am
$
0
0
Reporter Tatyana Lunegova (lunega) Tatyana Lunegova (lunega)
Created May 22, 2017 3:28:47 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 3:14:55 PM
Resolved Apr 16, 2018 3:14:52 PM
Subsystem Platform - Layered Settings
Assignee Anton Spilnyy (Anton.Spilnyy)
Priority Critical
State Fixed
Type Bug
Fix version Unidentified prior version
Affected versions No Affected versions
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
↧

RSRP-328929: Extract Parameters with lowercase naming conventions causes property names of extracted class to be appended with 1

April 16, 2018, 5:18 am
$
0
0
Reporter Jeff Barnes (jeff.barnes) Jeff Barnes (jeff.barnes)
Created Aug 3, 2012 7:40:07 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 3:18:00 PM
Resolved Apr 16, 2018 3:18:00 PM
Subsystem Refactorings
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Obsolete
Type Usability Problem
Fix version No Fix versions
Affected versions 7.0
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
I have Resharper configured with lowercase naming conventions for methods, properties, and parameters. For example, a parameter for first name would be spelled as first_name rather than FirstName. When I extract a class from parameters, the generated class uses property names that are appended with the number 1.

Here is an example:

public void method(string first_name, string last_name, string phone_number)
{
// Blah
}

Extract parameters to class named Person will result in:

public class Person
{
string first_name;
string last_name;
string phone_number;

public Person(string first_name, string last_name_, string phone_number)
{
this.first_name = first_name;
this.last_name = last_name;
this.phone_number = phone_number;
}

public string first_name1
{
get { return first_name; }
}

public string last_name1
{
get { return last_name; }
}

public string phone_number1
{
get { return phone_number; }
}
}


Ideally, I would prefer to see the generated class look like:

public class Person
{
public Person(string first_name, string last_name_, string phone_number)
{
this.first_name = first_name;
this.last_name = last_name;
this.phone_number = phone_number;
}

public string first_name
{
get; private set;
}

public string last_name
{
get; private set;
}

public string phone_number
{
get; private set;
}
}


Currently, I can work around this issue by converting the properties to automatic properties and rename the property names. However, I would rather not have to do this extra effort every time that I extract a class from parameters. Please add support to gracefully handle this scenario without appending numbers to the name of properties. This could be avoided with an option for automatic properties in this scenario.

I'm using build 7.0.97.60.
↧
Search

RSRP-328950: CA: "Format numeric value" that provides builder for standard/custom format strings

April 16, 2018, 5:26 am
$
0
0
Reporter Drew Noakes (drewnoakes) Drew Noakes (drewnoakes)
Created Aug 5, 2012 2:34:17 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 3:26:05 PM
Subsystem Context Actions
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Major
State Open
Type Feature
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 2018.1, 7.0
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
Full control of the conversion from numeric values to strings requires memorising some mini-languages:

- Standard Numeric Format Strings
- Custom Numeric Format Strings

Remembering all the details of these languages is tough, but they're actually very useful. ReSharper's in a great position to help out.

double d = 123.4;
Console.WriteLine(d|);

With the caret positioned as shown, R# detects that a conversion from a numeric type to a string is going to take place, and a CA is available that helps the developer build a valid numeric format string for the appropriate numeric type. The builder replaces the need to check online reference material as it lists all options and provides examples of how they format various values.

The builder provides all formatting options, including padding, decimal places, conversion to hex, presentation of negative numbers, scientific representation, percentage representation, etc.

This could also be available in other places that formatting might apply:

int i = 1234;
Console.WriteLine("{0|}", i);  // Console.WriteLine("{0:#,##0}", i)
Console.WriteLine(i|);         // Console.WriteLine(i.ToString("X4"));
var s = "ID = " + i|;          // var s = "ID = " + i.ToString("D6");

Equally, the CA is available on existing numeric formatting operations, and may be used to find out how it's going to format the value in question.

Support for custom format strings (both for positive/negative) would be great too.

Since standard conversions are culture sensitive, a builder may allow for investigation of conversions to strings in different cultures. This can be very useful when designing UI layouts that fail in other cultures because strings are longer/shorter than expected.

Related to issue: http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RSRP-328948
↧

RSRP-466305: Analysis is unsupported for document

April 16, 2018, 5:26 am
$
0
0
Reporter Philip Lee (philiplee) Philip Lee (philiplee)
Created Sep 18, 2017 3:50:39 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 3:26:26 PM
Resolved Apr 16, 2018 3:26:26 PM
Subsystem No Subsystem
Assignee Unassigned
Priority Normal
State Duplicate
Type Unspecified
Fix version No Fix versions
Affected versions 2017.2, 2017.1.2
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion VS 2017 15.3
I don't what version this started happening, but I'm getting 'Analysis is unsupported for document' on all .XAML, and on some .cs related to .XAML files e.g. view models which are just .cs files.

Tried reverting from 2017.2 to 2017.1.3. Same issue.

Only seems to be a problem in WPF projects.
↧
↧

RSRP-468986: Code Analysis not working most of the time

April 16, 2018, 5:26 am
$
0
0
Reporter Werner de Vries (werner.devries) Werner de Vries (werner.devries)
Created Mar 30, 2018 12:20:49 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 3:26:26 PM
Resolved Apr 7, 2018 10:25:34 PM
Subsystem Code Analysis
Assignee Sergey Kuks (coox)
Priority Critical
State Fixed
Type Bug
Fix version 2018.1
Affected versions 2017.3.3, 2017.3.5, 2017.3.1, 2017.3, 2017.3.2, 2017.2, 2017.1.2, 2017.1.1, 2017.1, 2016.3.1, 2016.3.2, 2016.3, 2017.2.1, 2017.2.2
Fixed In Version ReSharper 2018.1 RTM
VsVersion VS 2017 15.3, VS 2015 RTM

Summary: Resharper's Code Analysis is disabled for almost all files most of the time. Many of my colleagues report the same issue. The is a forum topic about it for a long time, but still no solution. I (and other people) tried a lot of things to get things working again, even after a complete reinstall of my PC and Visual Studio 2017 + Resharper the problem persists.

Since the forum topic does not get enough attention I decided to create this issue, because we pay enough money for these tools every year and now they only work 50% of the time. We might as well cancel our subscription if this does not get solved anytime soon.

Link to the forum topic: https://resharper-support.jetbrains.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/115000015424-Code-Analysis-Not-Working-on-Many-Files?page=1#community_comment_360000121564

↧

RSRP-469245: Downloaded latest version Resharper and In Visual Studio 2010 getting System Version 2.0.0.0 should be rereferned warning

April 16, 2018, 5:40 am
$
0
0
Reporter Bob Mossanen (bobmoss14@gmail.com) Bob Mossanen (bobmoss14@gmail.com)
Created Apr 12, 2018 9:49:14 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 3:40:29 PM
Subsystem Platform - Project Model
Assignee Slava Tutushkin (slava.tutushkin)
Priority Show-stopper
State Open
Type Bug
Fix version 2018.1.1
Affected versions No Affected versions
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions

latest version Resharper in Visual Studio 2010 Win form getting System Version 2.0.0.0 should be referenced warning message every were
Currently have C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\System.dll, from where do i get version 2.0.0.0

↧

RSRP-328993: Edit.LineOpenBelow Unexpected behavior

April 16, 2018, 5:42 am
$
0
0
Reporter James Alexander (yanigisawa) James Alexander (yanigisawa)
Created Aug 6, 2012 5:38:20 PM
Updated Apr 16, 2018 3:42:02 PM
Subsystem Context Actions
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Submitted
Type Usability Problem
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 2018.1, 7.1
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
I have my Resharper 7.1 (Build 7.0.98.60) Keyboard & Menus -> Keyboard Shortcuts set to "Visual Studio", as such, I don't expect the Edit.LineOpenBelow VS 2010 command to be overridden by R#. However, I'm seeing the below behavior:

Sample
if (1 == 1)
I{  // Caret Position
}
else
{
}

Key Chord: Ctrl+Shift+Enter (Edit.LineOpenBelow VS command)

Expected
if (1 == 1)
{ 
    I  // Caret Position
}
else
{
}

Actual
if (1 == 1)
{ 
}
else
{
}
I  // Caret Position

I have reset all visual studio settings to default, and even set the R# Keyboard Shortcuts to "None", and still R# overrides this behavior. Is there a work-around to get the default VS 2010 behavior?
↧
Viewing all 106942 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>