Quantcast
Channel: YouTrackReSharper (RSRP) - Bug and Issue Tracker
Viewing all 106942 articles
Browse latest View live

RSRP-297719: Failed to import method

$
0
0
Reporter Dmitry Osinovsky (Dmitry.Osinovsky) Dmitry Osinovsky (Dmitry.Osinovsky)
Created Apr 26, 2012 1:43:20 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 11:23:25 AM
Subsystem Quick Fixes
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Submitted
Type Feature
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 2018.3
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
I have this code in MVC application
        dynamic item = new {Id = 1};
HtmlHelper Html = null;
var b = Html.ActionLink(tem.Id, "/some/fancyUrl");

HtmlHelper is imported. ActionLink is shown in red (unresolved). QF offers to import method. But when I invoke QF, I get "Failed to import method" tooltip, and nothing else happens. I suggest not to show QF to import method in this situation and instead offer to cast first parameter to string (this would allow to resolve one of the method's overloads).

RSRP-325098: Wrong QuickFix "use '??'-operator" for "if" with T types

$
0
0
Reporter Alexander Kurakin (Alexander.Kurakin) Alexander Kurakin (Alexander.Kurakin)
Created Jul 10, 2012 4:31:17 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 11:27:08 AM
Resolved Oct 9, 2018 11:27:08 AM
Subsystem Quick Fixes
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Major
State Obsolete
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 7.0
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
private static T _instance;
public static T GetInstance()
{
    if (_instance == null)
        _instance = Activator.CreateInstance<T>();
    return _instance;
}

The "Convert to '??' expression" hint is showing up in the "Language Usage Opportunities" for the code above.

Applying that ReSharper fix to the code, VS reports the following while compiling:
"Operator '??' cannot be applied to operands of type 'T' and 'T'"

RSRP-327330: Mismatched type for assignment quickfix is confusing when properties on both sides of assignment operator have the same name

$
0
0
Reporter Drew Noakes (drewnoakes) Drew Noakes (drewnoakes)
Created Jul 18, 2012 11:22:20 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 11:27:54 AM
Resolved Oct 9, 2018 11:27:54 AM
Subsystem Quick Fixes
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Major
State Duplicate
Type Usability Problem
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 7.0
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
Of the three options, it's not clear which is which. It might be better to include the type name along with the property name if they match.

RSRP-84267: Quickfix texts are confusing when mismatching property type

$
0
0
Reporter Valentin Kipiatkov (valentin) Valentin Kipiatkov (valentin)
Created Oct 23, 2008 7:59:59 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 11:28:09 AM
Subsystem Quick Fixes
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Open
Type Usability Problem
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 2018.3
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
It's not clear that 'UsageChecker' in 2 quickfixes means 2 different properties.
See the screenshot.

RSRP-327616: When converting a line with a lambda in vb.net, it 'forgets' the predicate variable

$
0
0
Reporter Alex Berezoutsky (fergard) Alex Berezoutsky (fergard)
Created Jul 20, 2012 5:38:05 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 11:31:25 AM
Resolved Oct 9, 2018 11:31:25 AM
Subsystem Quick Fixes
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Fixed
Type Bug
Fix version Unidentified prior version
Affected versions 7.0
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
Imports System.Web.UI

Public Class _Default
Inherits Page

Protected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs) Handles Me.Load
Dim list As IQueryable(Of String) = New List(Of String) With {.Capacity = "first", .Capacity = "second"}
Dim first = list.Where(Function(s) s = "first").SingleOrDefault()
End Sub

End Class

RSRP-327753: ReSharper doesn't propose to replace the comparison with "false".

$
0
0
Reporter Yuri Antipin (botinko) Yuri Antipin (botinko)
Created Jul 22, 2012 12:32:51 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 11:36:15 AM
Subsystem Quick Fixes
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Submitted
Type Feature
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 7.0, 2018.3
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
In this code comparison with true is redundant:
return GetQuery().Where(p => p.Remove == true);
but when I change true to false, the system doesn't propose to replace the comparison with "false"
p => p.Remove == false
by
p => !p.Remove

RSRP-329225: Undo after Alt+Enter quickfix does not bring the cursor focus back to where the undo took place.

$
0
0
Reporter Alexander Kurakin (Alexander.Kurakin) Alexander Kurakin (Alexander.Kurakin)
Created Aug 15, 2012 3:52:28 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 11:38:51 AM
Subsystem Quick Fixes
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Submitted
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 7.0, 2018.3
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
when using the ALT+enter to fix errors multiple times and then using undo does not bring the cursor focus back to where the undo took place

RSRP-329598: "Move to another file to match type name" quickfix does not notice preprocessor directives

$
0
0
Reporter Roger Lipscombe (rlipscombe) Roger Lipscombe (rlipscombe)
Created Aug 30, 2012 2:46:42 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 11:43:04 AM
Resolved Oct 9, 2018 11:43:04 AM
Subsystem Quick Fixes
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Duplicate
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions No Affected versions
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
#if DEBUG
class Foo { }
#endif

Move to another file leaves the #if DEBUG/#endif in the original file.

RSRP-337056: Ignoring Preprocessor Conditionals

$
0
0
Reporter Rudi Visser (rudiv) Rudi Visser (rudiv)
Created Jan 4, 2013 8:18:30 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 11:45:30 AM
Resolved Oct 9, 2018 11:45:30 AM
Subsystem Quick Fixes
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Duplicate
Type Bug
Fix version No Fix versions
Affected versions 7.1.1
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
Take the following code as an example:
    var discoveryOptions = new Ljund.Common.Extensibility.DiscoveryOptions();
#if DEBUG
discoveryOptions.UseDebugTypeComparison = true;
#endif

ReSharper offers a 'Use Object Initializer' hint, thus ignoring the conditional, to provide the following code as a result:
    var discoveryOptions = new Ljund.Common.Extensibility.DiscoveryOptions {UseDebugTypeComparison = true};
#if DEBUG
#endif

RSRP-275283: join declaration and assignment - breaks code since it ignores #if DEBUG

$
0
0
Reporter mark van tilburg (mark.van.tilburg) mark van tilburg (mark.van.tilburg)
Created Sep 4, 2011 6:56:38 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 11:48:42 AM
Subsystem Context Actions
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Submitted
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 6.0, 2018.3
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
Taking this snippet
string site;
  1. if DEBUG
site = "http://localhost:52912/individualreport.aspx";
  1. else
site = ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings["application_uri"].ToString() + "individualreport.aspx";
  1. endif

When you coose join declaration and assignment it creates this:

  1. if DEBUG
site = "http://localhost:52912/individualreport.aspx";
  1. else
string site = ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings["application_uri"].ToString() + "individualreport.aspx";
  1. endif

Making a broken build for the DEBUG it should also had placed string in the #if DEBUG part.

RSRP-427687: When c# code contain #if DEBUG condition, optimize 'using' directives is not working correctly.

$
0
0
Reporter Jiri Beran (jiriberan) Jiri Beran (jiriberan)
Created Nov 13, 2014 2:38:08 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 11:53:33 AM
Subsystem Refactorings
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Submitted
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 8.0.2, 2018.3
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
In sample code below, optimize 'using' directives is not working correctly.
1) in case Debug configuration is active, using System.Threading.Tasks is removed. This will cause, that Release build will hang.
2) in case Release configuration is active, using System is removed. This will cause, that Debug build will hang.


using System;
using System.Threading.Tasks;

namespace rsharpTest
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{

#if DEBUG
{
//using System
var currentDir = Environment.CurrentDirectory;
}
#else
{
//using System.Threading.Tasks
var taskFactory = new TaskFactory();
}
#endif
}
}
}

RSRP-449224: Refactoring with conditional compilation statements

$
0
0
Reporter Gareth Evans (graz19m) Gareth Evans (graz19m)
Created Oct 9, 2015 2:01:35 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 11:54:13 AM
Resolved Oct 9, 2018 11:54:13 AM
Subsystem Refactorings
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Duplicate
Type Bug
Fix version No Fix versions
Affected versions No Affected versions
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
Given the following code

var foo1 = new Foo();

  1. if DEBUG
foo1.Bah();
  1. else
foo1.Bah();
  1. endif

If you rename foo1 to foo2, the usage is only updated in the active block, i.e. #if DEBUG if the Debug build configuration is selected.

A similar problem happens when you have a class that requires a namespace import. If this is the only class used from this namespace and is not in the active block then resharper suggests that you can remove the redundant namespace. Of course when you switch to release it doesn't compile because of the missing namespace.

RSRP-441584: Resharper makes bad suggestions when preprocessor directives are involved

$
0
0
Reporter Alexander Kurakin (Alexander.Kurakin) Alexander Kurakin (Alexander.Kurakin)
Created Jun 17, 2015 6:02:31 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 11:56:59 AM
Subsystem Quick Fixes
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Major
State Submitted
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 2018.3
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
Consider the following code:
static bool TestMethod() 
{
#if DEBUG
var rand = new Random();
if (rand.Next(1, 10) > 5)
return true;
#endif
return false;
}
This will suggest that the if statement be converted to a return statement. That results in this:
static bool TestMethod() 
{
#if DEBUG
var rand = new Random();
return rand.Next(1, 10) > 5;
#endif
}
Which does not compile in a release build because TestMethod does not return a value.

RSRP-430291: Refactoring of if expression wrapped in #if DEBUG

$
0
0
Reporter Alexander Kurakin (Alexander.Kurakin) Alexander Kurakin (Alexander.Kurakin)
Created Jan 13, 2015 4:35:32 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 12:01:28 PM
Subsystem Quick Fixes
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Submitted
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 2018.3
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
Resharper offers to convert next expression into ?: expression.
#if DEBUG 
if (Globals.DebugMode) // Полная версия css и js
{
Response.Write("<link rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href='Content/site.css' />\r\n");
}
else // Минимизированные css и js
#endif
{
Response.Write("<link rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href='Content/site.min.css' />\r\n");
}
but do it wrong:
#if DEBUG 
Response.Write(Globals.DebugMode ? "<link rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href='Content/site.css' />\r\n" : "<link rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href='Content/site.min.css' />\r\n");

RSRP-442476: Refactoring if -> switch bug

$
0
0
Reporter Alexander Kurakin (Alexander.Kurakin) Alexander Kurakin (Alexander.Kurakin)
Created Jun 26, 2015 3:15:52 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 12:07:23 PM
Resolved Oct 9, 2018 12:07:23 PM
Subsystem Context Actions
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Major
State Fixed
Type Bug
Fix version Unidentified prior version
Affected versions 9.1.1
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
I think it's a bug but I might be wrong.

I had code like this:
if (a) 
{
#if DEBUG
Foo()
#endif
}
else if(b || c)
{
Foo2()
}
Resharper suggested me to refactor to switch, so I hit alt+enter and it came up with:
switch (connection.HubConnection.State) 
{
case a:
#if DEBUG
Foo();
break;
#endif
case b:
case c:
Foo2();
default:
Sth();
break;
}
You see how it put break inside DEBUG clause? I think it should put break outside DEBUG clause.

RSRP-414472: Invalid placement of usings after "Move declaration to namespace" refactoring

$
0
0
Reporter Martin Suchan (Martin.Suchan) Martin Suchan (Martin.Suchan)
Created May 13, 2014 2:48:44 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 12:12:21 PM
Resolved Oct 9, 2018 12:12:21 PM
Subsystem Refactorings
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Critical
State Duplicate
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 9.1.3, 8.2.1, 9.1, 9.1.1, 9.1.2
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion VS 2013 RTM, VS 2015 RTM
See the screenshots - if I use the "Move declaration to namespace" refactoring and I got usings in #if #else #endif blocks, the refactorings places active usings from active IF block out of this block. This is unwanted.

bug1.png - before refactoring
bug2.png - after refactoring, actual state
bug3.png - expected state after the refactoring

R# 8.2.1 RC, VS2013 Update 2 RTM, WP8/Win8.1 project

RSRP-469899: Adjust namespaces breaks preprocessor directives

$
0
0
Reporter Tomasz Podolak (tpodolak) Tomasz Podolak (tpodolak)
Created May 28, 2018 1:42:38 AM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 12:12:31 PM
Subsystem Refactorings
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Submitted
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 2018.1.1, 2018.3
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions

Create a class with preprocessor directives which namespace doesn't correspond to the location

using System;
using System.Collections.Immutable;
using System.Linq;
using System.Reflection;
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis;
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics;
#if CSHARP
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp;
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax;
#elif VISUAL_BASIC
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic;
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.Syntax;
#endif

namespace ConsoleApp3
{
    public class MyClass
    {
        private SyntaxKind kind;
    }
}

Run Refactor this -> Adjust namespaces. Imported CSharp only namespace lands outside of preprocessor directive

JetBrains Rider 2018.1.1
Build #RD-181.4952.276, built on May 24, 2018
JRE: 1.8.0_152-release-1136-b38 amd64
JVM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM by JetBrains s.r.o
Windows 10 10.0

RSRP-422751: Naming refactoring doesn't respect compiler directives

$
0
0
Reporter Angelina Elycheva (Angelina.Elycheva) Angelina Elycheva (Angelina.Elycheva)
Created Sep 4, 2014 2:54:38 PM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 12:14:44 PM
Resolved Oct 9, 2018 12:14:44 PM
Subsystem Refactorings
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Normal
State Duplicate
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions No Affected versions
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
I use Xamarin and have projects that contain both desktop and Mobile implementations. This causes some variable/class implementation to be declared within if/else compiler directives. When refactoring variable names, ReSharper doesn't always get it right and when I switch from Desktop to Mobile or vice versa, there are variable references that remain with the old name.


            const string sql = "SELECT SettingValue FROM Settings WHERE SettingName = 'DBVersion'";

#if (__IOS__ || __ANDROID__)

// ReSharper disable once TooWideLocalVariableScope

SqliteCommand command;

SqliteDataReader reader;

#else

// ReSharper disable once TooWideLocalVariableScope

SQLiteCommand command;

SQLiteDataReader reader;

#endif

try
{

#if (__IOS__ || __ANDROID__)

command = new SqliteCommand(sql, _dbConnection);

#else

command = new SQLiteCommand(sql, _dbConnection);

#endif

reader = command.ExecuteReader();

reader.Read();

}

catch (Exception e)
{

ProgramSession.LogEvent("Error #DB 1011 - unable to retrieve Setting: DBVersion\r\n" + e.Message);

return;

}

if (reader.HasRows)
{

_version = Convert.ToInt16(reader["SettingValue"]);

}

reader.Close();

RSRP-467998: Inactive preprocessor branches aren't taken into account when refactoring

$
0
0
Reporter Ilya Suzdalnitski (suzdalnitski) Ilya Suzdalnitski (suzdalnitski)
Created Jan 18, 2018 2:14:20 AM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 12:14:44 PM
Subsystem Refactorings
Assignee Alisa Afonina (alisa.afonina)
Priority Critical
State Submitted
Type Bug
Fix version Backlog
Affected versions 2018.2
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions

We're using Rider for Unity development, and the specifics of Unity development is that we often have to use preprocessor branches such as #if UNITY_WEBGL, #if UNITY_EDITOR, etc.

Currently when refactoring, the code within a preprocessor branch is being treated as a comment. This makes code broken after refactorings have been made to one platform, and then we switch to another platform.

Sample code:

private void Test() {
   bool shouldCache = true;

   #if UNITY_WEBGL
   shouldCache = false;
   #endif

   if (shouldCache)
      CacheAssets();
}

Renaming the shouldCache variable will break the code if we're currently not on the WebGL platform:

private void Test() {
   bool shouldCacheAssets = true;

   #if UNITY_WEBGL
   shouldCache = false;
   #endif

   if (shouldCacheAssets)
      CacheAssets();
}

RSRP-471653: Could not create the VS text control for the view 00C305DE because there is already a text control created for it.

$
0
0
Reporter Lilia Shamsutdinova (Lilia.Shamsutdinova) Lilia Shamsutdinova (Lilia.Shamsutdinova)
Created Sep 24, 2018 11:58:02 AM
Updated Oct 9, 2018 12:16:41 PM
Subsystem Platform - VS Integration
Assignee Serge Baltic (baltic)
Priority Critical
State Submitted
Type Exception
Fix version No Fix versions
Affected versions 2018.3
Fixed In Version ReSharper Undefined
VsVersion All Versions
ReSharperPlatformVs15 Wave 183 Hive _3f3919c0 — JetBrains ReSharper Ultimate 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 183.0.20180924.54845-eap01d

JetBrains dotCover 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60324-eap01d
JetBrains dotMemory 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60150-eap01d
JetBrains dotTrace 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60311-eap01d
JetBrains ReSharper 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60052-eap01d
JetBrains ReSharper C++ 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60054-eap01d
JetBrains TeamCity Add-in 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60055-eap01d

SubProducts.0 = JetBrains dotCover 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60324-eap01d
SubProducts.1 = JetBrains dotTrace 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60311-eap01d
SubProducts.2 = JetBrains ReSharper C++ 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60054-eap01d
SubProducts.3 = JetBrains TeamCity Add-in 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60055-eap01d
SubProducts.4 = JetBrains ReSharper 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60052-eap01d
SubProducts.5 = JetBrains dotMemory 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60150-eap01d

Could not create the VS text control for the view 00C305DE because there is already a text control created for it.

— EXCEPTION #1/2 [InvalidOperationException]
Message = “Could not create the VS text control for the view 00C305DE because there is already a text control created for it.”
ExceptionPath = Root.InnerException
ClassName = System.InvalidOperationException
HResult = COR_E_INVALIDOPERATION=80131509
Source = JetBrains.Platform.VisualStudio.SinceVs10
StackTraceString = “
 at JetBrains.Platform.VisualStudio.SinceVs10.TextControl.VsTextControlCreatorDevTen.CreateTextControl[TTextControl](CreateTextControlParams`1 param)
 at JetBrains.Platform.VisualStudio.SinceVs10.TextControl.VsTextControlCreatorDevTen.CreateTextControl[TTextControl](CreateTextControlParams`1 param)
 at JetBrains.Platform.VisualStudio.SinceVs10.TextControl.AttachTextControlsToTextViews.VsAttachTextControlsToTextViews.<>c__DisplayClass0_1.<.ctor>b__1()
 at JetBrains.Application.Threading.IShellLocksEx.ExecuteWithReadLock(IShellLocks thіs, Action F)
 at JetBrains.Platform.VisualStudio.SinceVs10.TextControl.AttachTextControlsToTextViews.VsAttachTextControlsToTextViews.<>c__DisplayClass0_0.<.ctor>b__0(Lifetime lifetimeView, VsTextViewDataForTextControlDevTen data)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.ICollectionEventsEx.<>c__DisplayClass9_1`1.<ForEachItemCore>b__1()
 at JetBrains.Util.Logging.Logger.Catch(Action action)


— Outer —

— EXCEPTION #2/2 [LoggerException]
Message = “Could not create the VS text control for the view 00C305DE because there is already a text control created for it.”
ExceptionPath = Root
ClassName = JetBrains.Util.LoggerException
Data.ManagedThreadName = <NULL>
Data.LastExtension = xaml
Data.SccRevisionShell = “<there are no packages matching the criteria>”
Data.HostProductInfo = “JetBrains ReSharper Ultimate 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 183.0.20180924.54845-eap01d”
Data.SubProducts.#0 = “JetBrains dotCover 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60324-eap01d”
Data.SubProducts.#1 = “JetBrains dotTrace 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60311-eap01d”
Data.SubProducts.#2 = “JetBrains ReSharper C++ 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60054-eap01d”
Data.SubProducts.#3 = “JetBrains TeamCity Add-in 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60055-eap01d”
Data.SubProducts.#4 = “JetBrains ReSharper 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60052-eap01d”
Data.SubProducts.#5 = “JetBrains dotMemory 2018.3 EAP 1 D Build 2018.3.20180924.60150-eap01d”
Data.SccRevisionEnv = “
Platform\Core\Shell,
Platform\VisualStudio:
    git::refs/heads/183::07a69fc0d6451d5f13e7e98037b09212eba0086e

Data.VsVersion = 15.8.28010.2036
InnerException = “Exception #1 at Root.InnerException”
HResult = COR_E_APPLICATION=80131600
StackTraceString = “
 at JetBrains.Util.Logging.Logger.Catch(Action action)
 at JetBrains.Util.Logging.Logger.Catch(Action action)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.ICollectionEventsEx.<>c__DisplayClass9_0`1.<ForEachItemCore>b__0(AddRemoveEventArgs`1 args)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.Signal`1.NotifySinks(TValue payload)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.Signal`1.Fire(TValue value, Object cookie)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.CollectionEvents`1.FireAddRemove(AddRemove action, TValue value, Object cookie)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.CollectionEvents`1.InternalAdd(TValue value, Object cookie)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.CollectionEvents`1.Add(TValue value, Object cookie)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.ICollectionEventsEx.<>c__DisplayClass16_1`2.<FlowInto>b__1(AddRemoveEventArgs`1 args)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.Signal`1.NotifySinks(TValue payload)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.Signal`1.Fire(TValue value, Object cookie)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.CollectionEvents`1.FireAddRemove(AddRemove action, TValue value, Object cookie)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.DictionaryEvents`2.InternalAdd(KeyValuePair`2 value, Object cookie)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.DictionaryEvents`2.set_Item(TKey key, Object cookie, TValue value)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.DictionaryEvents`2.set_Item(TKey key, TValue value)
at JetBrains.Platform.VisualStudio.SinceVs10.TextControl.AttachTextControlsToTextViews.VsTextViewDataForTextControlCollectorDevTen.<>c__DisplayClass0_1.<.ctor>g__ApplyData|4(IWpfTextView view, VsTextViewDataForTextControlDevTen newdata)
 at JetBrains.Platform.VisualStudio.SinceVs10.TextControl.AttachTextControlsToTextViews.VsTextViewDataForTextControlCollectorDevTen.<>c__DisplayClass0_7.<.ctor>b__17()
 at JetBrains.Platform.VisualStudio.SinceVs10.TextControl.AttachTextControlsToTextViews.VsTextViewDataForTextControlCollectorDevTen.<>c__DisplayClass0_7.<.ctor>b__17()
 at JetBrains.Application.Threading.IShellLocksEx.ExecuteWithReadLock(IShellLocks thіs, Action F)
 at JetBrains.Platform.VisualStudio.SinceVs10.TextControl.AttachTextControlsToTextViews.VsTextViewDataForTextControlCollectorDevTen.<>c__DisplayClass0_1.<.ctor>b__6(EventArgs`1 args)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.Signal`1.NotifySinks(TValue payload)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.Signal`1.Fire(TValue value, Object cookie)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.Signal`1.Fire(TValue value)
 at JetBrains.Platform.VisualStudio.SinceVs10.TextControl.AttachTextControlsToTextViews.TrackVsTextViewDataForTextControlChangesEx.<>c__DisplayClass0_0.<FireTextViewDataChanged>b__0()
 at JetBrains.Platform.VisualStudio.SinceVs10.TextControl.AttachTextControlsToTextViews.TrackVsTextViewDataForTextControlChangesEx.FireTextViewDataChangedImpl(ITrackVsTextViewDataForTextControlChanges trackVsTextViewDataForTextControlChanges, Lifetime lifetime, IShellLocks locks, Action action)
 at JetBrains.Platform.VisualStudio.SinceVs10.TextControl.AttachTextControlsToTextViews.TrackVsTextViewDataForTextControlChangesEx.FireTextViewDataChanged(ITrackVsTextViewDataForTextControlChanges trackVsTextViewDataForTextControlChanges, Lifetime lifetime, IShellLocks locks, Func`1 isEventStillActual, IWpfTextView wpfTextView)
 at JetBrains.Platform.VisualStudio.SinceVs10.IDE.VsDocumentManagerWhidbey_TrackVsTextViewDataForTextControlChanges.<>c__DisplayClass0_0.<.ctor>b__2()
 at JetBrains.UI.Application.LocalReentrancyGuard.TryExecute(Action action)
 at JetBrains.Platform.VisualStudio.SinceVs10.IDE.VsDocumentManagerWhidbey_TrackVsTextViewDataForTextControlChanges.<>c__DisplayClass0_1.<.ctor>b__0(EventArgs`1 args)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.Signal`1.NotifySinks(TValue payload)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.Signal`1.Fire(TValue value, Object cookie)
 at JetBrains.DataFlow.Signal`1.Fire(TValue value)
 at JetBrains.VsIntegration.ProjectDocuments.VsDocumentManagerWhidbey.OnRegisterTextBuffer(VsTextBufferData textBufferData, Boolean forceReregisterEventProjectFileIsTheSame)
 at JetBrains.VsIntegration.ProjectDocuments.VsDocumentManagerWhidbey.<>c__DisplayClass26_0.<OnRdtAfterFirstDocumentLock>b__0()
 at JetBrains.Application.Threading.IShellLocksEx.ExecuteWithReadLock(IShellLocks thіs, Action F)
 at JetBrains.VsIntegration.ProjectDocuments.VsDocumentManagerWhidbey.<>c__DisplayClass23_0.<ExecuteOrQueueOrMergeUnguardedCallbackWithLog>b__0()
 at JetBrains.Util.Concurrency.UnguardedCallbackMerger.<>c__DisplayClass8_1.<ExecuteOrQueueOrMerge>b__0()
 at JetBrains.Threading.ReentrancyGuardEx.<>c__DisplayClass0_1.<Queue>b__3()
 at JetBrains.Threading.ReentrancyGuard.Execute(String name, Action action)
 at JetBrains.Threading.ReentrancyGuard.ExecutePendingActions()
 at JetBrains.Threading.JetDispatcher.Closure.Execute()
 at JetBrains.Util.Concurrency.WinJetDispatcher.ProcessQueue(Int32 nMinBucket)
 at JetBrains.Util.Concurrency.WinJetDispatcher.<>c__DisplayClass18_0.<BeginInvokeCore>b__0()
 at System.Windows.Threading.DispatcherOperation.InvokeDelegateCore()
 at System.Windows.Threading.DispatcherOperation.InvokeImpl()
 at System.Windows.Threading.DispatcherOperation.InvokeInSecurityContext(Object state)
 at MS.Internal.CulturePreservingExecutionContext.CallbackWrapper(Object obj)
 at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.RunInternal(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state, Boolean preserveSyncCtx)
 at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state, Boolean preserveSyncCtx)
 at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state)
 at MS.Internal.CulturePreservingExecutionContext.Run(CulturePreservingExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state)
 at System.Windows.Threading.DispatcherOperation.Invoke()
 at System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher.ProcessQueue()
 at System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher.WndProcHook(IntPtr hwnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam, Boolean& handled)
 at MS.Win32.HwndWrapper.WndProc(IntPtr hwnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam, Boolean& handled)
 at MS.Win32.HwndSubclass.DispatcherCallbackOperation(Object o)
 at System.Windows.Threading.ExceptionWrapper.InternalRealCall(Delegate callback, Object args, Int32 numArgs)
 at System.Windows.Threading.ExceptionWrapper.TryCatchWhen(Object source, Delegate callback, Object args, Int32 numArgs, Delegate catchHandler)
 at System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher.LegacyInvokeImpl(DispatcherPriority priority, TimeSpan timeout, Delegate method, Object args, Int32 numArgs)
 at MS.Win32.HwndSubclass.SubclassWndProc(IntPtr hwnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam)
Viewing all 106942 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>